Encounter Win Conditions

Encounter Win Condition Tablehere's a quick peek into what i'm working on: player authored content.

so. basically, it breaks down to some basic building blocks like i've outlined before. eventually, it comes down to describing an encounter.

now, an encounter can really be anything. think of it as a 'scene' in the movies. a particular 'event' happening at a particular 'location' with particular 'objects.' now, keep in mind that players can author (craft) anything in the world they want. creatures, weapons, cooking utensils — whatever. players can also author these encounter things. that's really what i want to talk about.

it's where these encounters meet objects and require a 'win condition' to move on.

so, when the author sets things up, he creates an encounter. in that encounter, say, the basement of a library for example, he can place all manner of pre-made objects or create new ones in the encounter. (keep in mind this is web-based, so creating a new item on the fly is as easy as a short ajaxified-pop-in-pop-out form)

our author plugs in a short description of the encounter, attaches a few objects and sets one of these win condition things.

back in our library, maybe our author writes some short, pithy description like "You are in the basement of the library. Around you are dusty shelves, a couple boxes and a cloudy mirror leaning against the wall."

well. those bolded words would automatically (in an ideal world. still debating on that one. worst case scenario, they are manual for a bit. certainly manual if the author created them specifically for this adventure.) be linked to objects in our database. the player, as they are pondering why it's so dusty in the basement, can click on 'dusty shelves' and see a detailed description and picture of them.

now, below this quip of text on the 'encounter page' would be two dropdown lists — one with your all of your skills and actions, the other with all of the objects in the encounter — just those two lists and a submit button.

basically, you're picking your verb and noun of the encounter.

now, back to the author. when he (or she, i suppose) sets up the encounter win situation, he picks one of the objects, picks a skill or ability (say… search.) and then sets a value required to accomplish the feat. the player will have an opportunity to beat that value and progress to the 'success encounter' or the 'failure encounter.' the player gets xp that correlates directly with how high that value is.

the player — let's assume he picks 'search' from his list of character skills and 'dusty shelves' from the objects list. the target value is a 12. he gets a skill total of 18 when he hits 'submit.' he progresses (the new web page loads) to the encounter that talks about the lever cleverly hidden behind some aging books on the shelf. or the one where a giant spider jumps out. or the one where his reflection steps out of the mirror while his back is turned examining the shelf. whatever.

(oh, and i should mention, the author gets a share of xp for every encounter of his a player plays.)

because we're stacking skills, abilities, objects and events, we can get away with allowing all kinds of fun scenarios to be created, and yet still be tied to tactical values in the game.

it's pretty much an entire game built on opposed checks and the effects of those.

it's kind of like a community-content driven, semi-graphical (all objects and encounters can have images attached to them) mud (of telnet yore) with a heavy reliance on pvp and crafting, yet, without the intimidating free-form text entry — just point and click accessibility of the web.

well. kind of.



3 comments so far

  1. nihill on

    pimp! Sounds like story driven freedom? I think you semi-addressed this, but what’s to stop me from creating an adventure with row after row of statue warriors each that you must attack to destroy and each giving “X” amount of experiance? Couldn’t I “power-level” anyone that wanted to run the adventure buy providing something skewed so the adventurer could get risk free experiance?

  2. m3mnoch on

    yep. you sure can. and, if that’s the way folks want to play, that’s the way they can play.

    i might add, tho, that there are other elements i haven’t really talked about yet like each encounter costs a turn. everyone gets the exact same amount of turns as everyone else, so, where you destroy statues, someone else may be beating up orcs. someone else may be solving riddles. all for the same xp.

    if all you want to do is click next-next-next you can. it’ll take you less time, but you’re not going to get anymore experience than someone who actually goes through an adventure and ‘reads’ everything.


  3. nihill on

    Sounds good.. If there’s a balance of sorts or a system that limits people from getting way more experiance than the rest then I think you’re right. Bottom line is it doesn’t ‘really’ matter how people get the exp, as long as there isn’t an unfair advantage for doing it the fast easy way. Right?

    On a side note, have you considered anything along the lines of a ranking system for the adventures perhaps something as the adventures ends where the participant selects a radio button, etc. and optionally fills out a comment?


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: